DO NOT FORGET HOW OBAMA, THE PROGRESSIVES (COMMUNISTS) AND ALL AND ONLY THE DEMOCRATS CONSPIRED TO PERVERT THE LAWS OF THE LAND AND TO TOTALLY DISREGARD THE CONSTITUTION!
OBAMACARE ARCHITECT, JONATHAN GRUBER BRAZZENLY ADMITTED THAT OBAMA AND ALL THE DEMOCRATS KNEW THEY HAD TO DELIBERATELY LIE, CAMOUFLAGE AND MISLEAD THE COUNTRY AND DEPEND ON THE STUPIDITY OF AMERICANS, ESPECIALLY THE IGNORANT, LOW INFORMATION SHEEPLE OF THE DEMOCRATIC FLOCK!
THE LYING PIECES OF SHEET, OBAMA, REID, PELOSI AND ALL THE DECEITFUL DEMOCRATS DIDN’T DARE ADMIT THEIR REAL INTENTIONS BECAUSE THEY KNEW THE MAJORITY OF THE COUNTRY WOULD NOT AND STILL DON’T SUPPORT IT!
BUT EVERY LYING PIECE OF SHEET DEMOCRAT KNEW OBAMA WAS LYING TO AMERICA!
WHAT WOULDN’T FREEDOM LOVING AMERICANS SUPPORT?
A LAW THAT COMES FROM THE PLAY BOOK OF CHAVEZ, CASTRO, MAO, LENIN AND STALIN. ALL HEROES OF THE OBAMA NATION!
NATIONALIZE HEALTHCARE TO CONTROL THE POPULATION
THE LYING LEFT SLANDERED AND FALSELY ACCUSED REPUBLICANS (the only ones to read the bill) OF RACISM, BIGOTRY AND HATING THE POOR!
“During the intense debate over ACU, the Republicans were denigrated and vilified for being opposed to the legislation that very few, if any, lawmaker read. In fact, one congressman, Alan Grayson of Florida, told the American people that Republicans ‘want you to die’ because they opposed Obama’s monstrosity,” said former hospital security director and police chief, Tony Arcadian. “I believe these people should face criminal charges for perpetrating a fraud. Eric Holder prosecuted businessmen for less,” Arcadian added.
“Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage,” says the MIT economist who helped write Obamacare. “And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really, really critical for the thing to pass.”
REMEMBER! THIS WAS THE PLAN ALL ALONG! OBAMA, PROGRESSIVES(COMMUNISTS) AND DEMOCRATS TO GET TO SINGLE PAYER!
AND THE LYING LEFT DOESN’T CARE IF OBAMACARE WORKS… THAT DOESN’T MATTER!
IF QUALITY OF CARE DRASTICLY REDUCED…. THAT DOESN’T MATTER!
IF PREMIUMS DOUBLE AND TRIPLE … THAT DOESN’T MATTER!
SOCIALIZED MEDICINE IS ALL THAT MATTERS!
OBAMA AND ALL THE DEMOCRATS PREMEDITATED FIVE YEARS AGO TO DESTROY THE HEALTH INSURANCE INDUSTRY AND TO PURPOSELY, KNOWINGLY AND DELIBERATELY LIE TO ALL AMERICANS ABOUT OBAMACARE!
AND THE SOCIALIST DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL PARTY LAUGH AT WHAT THEY HAVE DONE!
UNFORTUNATELY WE ARE A FORGETFUL PEOPLE!
IT’S WHAT THE OBAMA NATION IS COUNTING ON! (just like Solyndra, Fast & Furious, shovel ready jobs, Pig Ford, IRS, NSA, Benghazi, Census Bureau, Union kickbacks, bypassing Congress, funding Muslim Brotherhood, )
REMEMBER ALL THE CORRUPTION OF THIS ADMINISTRATION! DON’T FORGET!
IT’S WHAT THE ALPHABET NEWS, OBAMA’S PROPAGANDA MACHINE IS HOPING FOR! (the press has abandoned their role as 4th estate, the guard dog has become a lap dog)
HOW DID DEMOCRATS PASS A LAW (obamacare) THAT NOBODY WANTED?
WRITTEN BY DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS MOST AMERICANS DON’T LIKE (current approval of Congress 5% )
APPROVED BY DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS WHO WOULD RATHER SHUT DOWN THE GOVERNMENT THEN GIVE UP THEIR WAIVERS AND SUBSIDIES AND BE UNDER OBAMACARE LIKE THE REST OF US.
LETS REVIEW THE HISTORY OF HOW OBAMACARE CAME TO BE, EVEN THOUGH THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN AGAINST IT
HOW DID THIS HAPPEN?
FOLLOW THE MONEY. ..
THAT’S A EQUALIZER. ..AS INTENDED THE HOUSE CONTROLS THE PURSE… AND THE HOUSE IS CLOSEST TO THE PEOPLE. ..AS INTENDED…
AGAIN, THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS ARE AND ALWAYS HAVE BEEN AGAINST OBAMACARE. …THROUGH MANIPULATION OF COMPLETELY CHANGING A PASSED BILL IN THE HOUSE (all revenue bills must originate in the house) DEMOCRATS IN THE SENATE BASTARDIZED HR3590 A MILITARY HOUSING BILL, REMOVING ALL LANGUAGE AND TURNING IT INTO PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT, AKA OBAMACARE
THE SENATE AT THIS TIME HAVE 60 DEMOCRATS, JUST ENOUGH TO PASS OBAMACARE OVER ANY REPUBLICAN OPPOSITION .
THEN TED KENNEDY DIES! THEY ONLY HAVE 59! MASSACHUSETTS NEEDS TO VOTE IN ANOTHER DEMOCRATIC SENATOR. ..PIECE OF CAKE, RIGHT? MASSACHUSETTS ALWAYS VOTES DEMOCRAT, RIGHT?
WRONG! EVEN MASSACHUSETTS AGAINST OBAMACARE VOTES IN REPUBLICAN SCOTT BROWN! BROWN’S WHOLE CAMPAIGN IS TO VOTE AGAINST OBAMACARE!
THE DEMOCRATS ARE DEVESTATED! HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN IN MASSACHUSETTS? !
NOW HERE IS WERE IT GETS SLEEZY
THE DEMOCRATS KNOW THAT IF IT GOES TO THE HOUSE AND ANY CHANGES ARE MADE IT WOULD GO BACK TO THE SENATE TO VOTE AGAIN…OBAMACARE WOULD BE DEFEATED AS WAS THE WISH AND WILL OF THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS!
THROUGH BACK ROOM DEALS, BRIBES AND THREATS (corrupt Chicago politics)THEY MADE A DEAL WITH THE DEMOCRATIC CONTROLLED HOUSE (that’s right the Democrats controlled Congress) THAT THEY WOULD PASS THE SENATE BILL WITH NO CHANGES EVEN THOUGH SOME THINGS IN IT VIOLATED SOME OF REPRESENTATIVES PROMISES TO THEIR CONSTITUENTS (but with Democrats, when had that ever mattered) AND IN RETURN THE SENATE PROMISED TO PASS A SEPERATE BILL FROM THE HOUSE FOR CHANGES IN OBAMACARE. THAT WAS THE RECONCILIATION BILL OF 2010….BOTH BILLS WERE PASSED IN THE HOUSE.
BUT THERE WAS A CATCH. ..OBAMACARE WAS PASSED BUT THE RECONCILIATION BILL OF 2010 HAD TO GO TO THE SENATE AND IT NEEDED TO BE PASSED BUT THEY ONLY HAD 59 VOTES!
SO SINCE DEMOCRATS COULDN’T GET THE VOTES BECAUSE THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE WAS TO DEFEAT OBAMACARE BY THE ELECTION OF SCOTT BROWN. ..THE DEMOCRATS CHANGED THE RULES, FROM REQUIRING 60 VOTES TO A SIMPLE MAJORITY, ALSO GIVING COVER TO SEVERAL DEMOCRA TS WHO WERE GOING AGAINST THE PEOPLE THAT VOTED FOR THEM AND TELLING THE PEOPLE THEY COULD GO TO HELL! DEMOCRATS COULD CARE LESS WHAT THE PEOPLE WANTED…THE PEOPLE WHO VOTED FOR THESE DEMOCRATS TO REPRESENT THEM…THESE DEMOCRATS SPITING THEIR FACE AND BETRAYED THE TRUST AND WILL OF THE PEOPLE!
TO QUOTE ALCEE HASTINGSOF THE RULES COMMITEES DURING THE BILL PROCESS SAID “WE ARE MAKING UP THE RULES AS WE GO ALONG”
THIS WAS A PAGE OUT OF SAUL ALINSKY’S PLAY BOOK “THE END JUSTIFIES ANY MEANS”
BUT THEN THE POTUS OR POS (you make the call) AND ALL AND ONLY DEMOCRATS, HAVE MEETINGS AND MAKE A PREMEDITATED PLAN TO PURPOSELY, KNOWINGLY AND DELIBERATELY LIE TO ALL AMERICANS!
THE POSOTUS LOOKED US IN THE EYE, SMILED AND DELIBERATELY LIED TO US!
AND NOW, THANKS ONLY TO OBAMA AND DEMOCRATS THIS IS WHAT WE GOT!
NOW IT IS TIME TO GET RID OF THIS ABOMINATION!
RECONCILIATION! 51 VOTES ALL THAT NEEDED… REPUBLICANS NOW HAVE 53 SEATS AND POSSIBLY 54!
IN THE HOUSE BEFORE ELECTIONS 10 DEMOCRATS VOTED WITH REPUBLICANS AGAINST OBAMACARE (8 are now gone)
PERHAPS 6 DEMOCRATS WOULD SEE THE LIGHT LOL
MOST LIKELY THE BILL PASSED BY CONGRESS WOULD BE VETOED BY OBAMA
CONGRESS COULD DEFEND OBAMACARE AND THEN THE 2016 ELECTIONS!
LET THE DEMOCRATS RUN AGAINST REPUBLICANS ON THIS ISSUE!
LETS SEE HOW AMERICANS WILL VOTE
WILL THEY VOTE FOR DEMOCRATS WHO ARE CONFESSED LIARS?
WILL THEY VOTE FOR DEMOCRATS WHO THINK THE VOTERS ARE STUPID?
WILL THEY VOTE FOR THE DEMOCRAT’S ABOMINATION THAT DESTROYED THE 40 HOUR WORK WEEK?
WILL THEY VOTE FOR THE DEMOCRAT’S ABOMINATION THAT FORCED MANY AMERICANS TO HAVE TO GET 2 OR 3 PART TIME JOBS TO SERVICE?
WILL THEY VOTE FOR THE DEMOCRAT’S ABOMINATION THAT RESULTED IN LOWER PAYING JOBS AND A LOWER QUALITY OF LIFE?
REPUBLICANS DO HAVE AN ALTERNATIVE !
ALL REPUBLICANS AGREE ON THESE PRINCIPALS
1. They want to end the tax bias in favor of employer-sponsored health insurance to create full portability (either through a tax credit, deductibility, or another method);
2. They want to reform medical malpractice laws (likely through carrot incentives to the states);
3. They want to allow for insurance purchases across state lines;
4. They want to support state-level pre-existing condition pools;
5. They want to fully block grant Medicaid;
6. They want to shift Medicare to premium support;
7. They want to speed up the FDA device and drug approval process; and
8. They want to maximize the health savings account model, one of the few avenues proven to lower health care spending, making these high deductible + HSA plans more attractive where Obamacare hamstrung them.
The best time to put such plans on the table is in a presidential campaign, or when the party holds both Houses of Congress and can pass at least parts of it and force the President to veto.
AND THE REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANIDATE WOULD HAVE ACTUAL PLAN
negotiated with Congress even if Jindal wins the presidency.
At a conceptual level, Jindal’s plan – like most GOP proposals – diverges from the outset from plans like Obamacare-Romneycare-Hillarycare that promise “universal” coverage and set out to achieve it by (1) forcing people against their will into common insurance pools, (2) forcing insurance companies against their will into insuring all comers, (3) forcing employers to provide health insurance to certain of their employees, (4) in the case of how Obamacare was originally designed, forcing states to follow federal dictates in how and to whom they provide Medicaid, and (5) dictating in minute detail the terms on which all of these compelled interactions are carried out. Even with all of those mandates, even the optimistic CBO projections at the time the Affordable Care Act was passed estimated that the bill would reduce the uninsured population only from 54 million to 23 million by 2019, and those projections have grown less rosy over time, reminding us that universal burdens on the public do not guarantee universal compliance. Rather than chase the chimera of a one-size-fits-everyone plan that will never actually fit everyone, Jindal’s plan revives the premise of our pre-Obamacare healthcare system (where over 80% were insured and about 85% of the insured were happy with their health insurance) and seeks to create the conditions of lower cost and more competition that will entice more people to voluntarily choose a health insurance plan. If this sounds like a familiar concept to you, it’s because that’s how the rest of the American economy works, and always has.
From his perspective as a Governor, Jindal also wants to reverse the centralization of power over health insurance in Washington, and create competition between states to offer better health insurance. Thus, in place of having mandatory federal rules (for Medicaid, for insurers, for employers, and for individuals) that are subject to waivers and delays at the whim and favor of the President and HHS, he would write more latitude for states directly into law, block-granting Medicaid funds and reducing the federal role to holding states accountable foroutcomes rather than micromanaging their process (spoiler alert: Jindal has strongly signalled that this will also be his approach to education). Sarlin frets that this permissive approach “might just spawn dozens of mini-Obamacares at the state level,” but at least that would be those states’ choice, and in a blogger conference call this afternoon, Jindal stressed that by allowing insurance policies to be sold across state lines, he would rely on competition to incentivize states to avoid imposing an unreasonable volume of mandates.
For individuals who can afford their own healthcare, Jindal would step back and give them more tools to take control: a tax deduction on par with the employer deduction, and more health savings accounts to encourage people to be more involved in the costs of healthcare. Jindal is less interested than Obama in enrolling healthy, childless adults above the poverty line in Medicaid. But for those who legitimately cannot afford healthcare, Jindal’s plan recognizes that government is too involved to simply walk away: he’s proposing separate high-risk pools for people with pre-existing conditions, and focusing on making sure Medicaid focuses the safety net on those most in need. He would also keep in place the pre-Obamacare laws guaranteeing the continuation of coverage when you change jobs once you have insurance, regardless of whether you’ve gotten sicker since first enrolling. Jindal argues that Obamacare has undermined these protections.
Some of Jindal’s proposals are things that could be enacted now at the state level already, or proposed piecemeal at the federal level in 2015, and much of it could be enacted in stages rather than in one swoop. That’s a strength: it would enable him to avoid another thousand-page omnibus bill infested with hidden goodies, and provides some intermediate goals for activists to focus on between now and 2016. But it also means that at least some of his proposals (like tort reforms at the state level) would be beyond his reach to command even from the White House.
Medicare premium support, whether as a voluntary supplement to the current system or a phased-in replacement, will be more controversial, and Jindal’s plan isn’t entirely explicit on how it would approach that thorny problem. Nor is this a complete plan with all the accounting gimmickry needed to pass the CBO’s arcane rituals for deficit scoring; the sacrificing of the required number of goats and chickens to satisfy the CBO models will have to wait. And Jindal’s promise of more pro-life and conscience protections, while popular with social conservatives, will likewise test his fortitude if he makes it far enough to propose actual legislation. But as far as frameworks go, this is already a fairly detailed view of where Jindal wants to take American healthcare into the post-Obamacare world.
I SAY LETS TAKE THAT BET!
IF YOU AGREE…. PLEASE SHARE!