Based on three US government reports, the US government expenditures on climate change exceed $165 billion, since Fiscal Year (FY) 1993. Expenditures on what the reports identify as pure “climate science” exceed $35 billion since FY 1993.
Those green and renewable energies – solar, wind, biofuels – are all energy balance-negative (they require more conventional energy to produce than they can generate), unreliable, extremely expensive, and environmentally destructive. Also, there is now a wealth of contrary literature debunking that gigantic conspiracy, written by investigative reporters and politicians Christopher Horner, Robert Carter, Senator Inhofe, Rupert Darwall, AW Montford, and David Archibald among other investigative journalists and politicians describing the lies, fakes, phony data, opposite conclusions, redacting by UN political hacks, reverse graphs, destruction of negative data, etc., that have exposed this far-left propaganda in painful detail. Also, the Oregon Petition (see Internet) signed by 31,487 independent US scientists (including 9,029 with PhD degrees), disputes the false “science” of the UN panel and its “scientists”. Another such document named The Manhattan Declaration lists some 720 scientists, including 120 pure climatologists, states the same. Former Vice-President Al “Jazeera” Gore, another low IQ bloviating gasbag, has ridden that “global warming” horse to a personal wealth estimated to reach a billion dollars, while being entertained by elegant and expensive hookers in luxury hotel suites.
If President Obama persists and succeeds in his “Cap & Trade” program, we should expect astronomical energy prices (say – a monthly electricity bill $600 instead of $200 for a 2-bedroom house); gas for your car at $8/gallon; etc.), massive bankruptcies of private companies, huge unemployment numbers, high inflation, wide-spread nationalizations of energy companies, and very likely large-scale civil unrest in the cities. But then perhaps President Obama is in fact aiming to achieve all that, so that he can proclaim a state of emergency authorizing him to use dictatorial powers with no end in sight, thus nullifying the 22nd Amendment. We will see more taxes and less “tax expenditures” – that’s the new name for what’s left in your take-home paycheck, according to La Pelosi. Today I e-mailed my standard “global warming – cooling – climate change” harangue to the sole senator who has stood up to that Marxist monstrosity of Cap & Trade: Oklahoma’s Senator James Inhofe. He wrote an excellent book detailing the UN Panel chicaneries and his battles with our Eco-Nazis.
The answer to this is not man-made “Global Warming” or “Climate Change”, but the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation. See the Federal Governments own info on this: http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/phod/amo_faq.php
1. For years now none of the dire “imminent catastrophes” claimed global warmist have occurred. No rising average temperatures, no melting polar ice caps (they do seasonally melt around the edges in their summer, but they refreeze in their winter), no drowning coastlines, and no starving or drowning polar bears — not a one.
2. What is clear now is that “global warming” (now called “climate change”) is a political movement whose real agenda is global wealth redistribution. The mechanism to effect global wealth redistribution is the so-called “Cap & Trade in Carbon Credits — wherein rich nations would be obligated to buy the assigned carbon credits of poor nations.
3. While poor nations (more than 100) are all eager to sell their “Carbon Credits”, rich nations don’t buy into the global wealth redistribution plan. So a fictional imminent global warming catastrophe was invented to stampede the ignorant masses to agitate for their governments to pass Cap & Trade legislation. Never mind that Cap & Trade would do nothing to alleviate global warming (if it were actually occurring.)
4. US government-designated “scientist” and the IPCC are jus0t a subset of political activist, self-described as “climate scientist,” very few of which with real academic credentials in climatology (the real science). Their purpose is to create a pseudo-science of “climate change” and a base of rigged reports and fake dire predictions — all with the intent to create a hysteria in the voting public and in otherwise ignorant politicians to pass Cap & Trade legislation.
5. There is a legitimate scientific organization with real scientists credentialed in climatology and related fields that evaluates IPCC “studies and predictions.” It is called the NIPCC (Non-governmental panel on Climate Change) Their evaluations are posted on their web sites at: